Re: StGit: kha/{stable,safe,experimental} updated

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: StGit: kha/{stable,safe,experimental} updated

Karl Wiberg-2
On 2008-07-27 09:44:31 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> 2008/7/25 Karl Hasselström <[hidden email]>:
>
> > The big update since last time is support (in kha/experimental) for
> > hidden patches in the new-infrastructure commands and stack log.
>
> I'll have a look at the new stack log format (my main worry) this
> week but the other patches look OK.

Heh. It's _always_ your main worry. But rightly so, since mistakes
could be costly. Thanks for spending time on this with me.

I made one change apart from adding the hidden patches: use the same
tree for both the full and simplified logs. It's no more costly to
write, and made the parsing substantially simpler.

> I merged the safe and stable branches.

Thanks.

--
Karl Hasselström, [hidden email]
      www.treskal.com/kalle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [hidden email]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: StGit: kha/{stable,safe,experimental} updated

Catalin Marinas
2008/8/1 Karl Hasselström <[hidden email]>:

> On 2008-07-27 09:44:31 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
>> 2008/7/25 Karl Hasselström <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> > The big update since last time is support (in kha/experimental) for
>> > hidden patches in the new-infrastructure commands and stack log.
>>
>> I'll have a look at the new stack log format (my main worry) this
>> week but the other patches look OK.
>
> Heh. It's _always_ your main worry. But rightly so, since mistakes
> could be costly. Thanks for spending time on this with me.

I'm usually worried about performance but will give it a try with a
Linux kernel and real patches. Have you done any tests to compare it
with my master branch?

Would we even need to prune the stack history? It might get pretty
large after about 1-2 years of usage.

--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [hidden email]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: StGit: kha/{stable,safe,experimental} updated

Karl Wiberg-2
On 2008-08-05 22:33:57 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> 2008/8/1 Karl Hasselström <[hidden email]>:
>
> > Heh. It's _always_ your main worry. But rightly so, since mistakes
> > could be costly. Thanks for spending time on this with me.
>
> I'm usually worried about performance but will give it a try with a
> Linux kernel and real patches. Have you done any tests to compare it
> with my master branch?

Yes. I posted the benchmark results a while back -- as I recall, the
performance was about the same for large uncommit and rebase
operations.

Also, I'm currently investigating some possible optimizations. Will
post new bechmarks afterwards, if I get something working.

> Would we even need to prune the stack history? It might get pretty
> large after about 1-2 years of usage.

Yes, it's growing without bound, so eventually one would have to prune
it.

--
Karl Hasselström, [hidden email]
      www.treskal.com/kalle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [hidden email]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html